Weighting daggerboard on 26M, did you like it?

A forum for discussing boat or trailer repairs or modifications that you have made or are considering.
User avatar
delevi
Admiral
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:03 am
Location: San Francisco Catalina 380, former 26M owner
Contact:

Post by delevi »

It's a 105 jib. I'm not sure what the standard is. I heard figures from 99 to 105. Sunbrella cover for RF. I also had a luff pad put on so it can be reefed to 2/3 size without loosing much shape. Haven't used that feature yet, since the winds are light this time of year. Same material as the main... Quantum Fusion X. Elaborate pattern of pentex strands on a milar scrim with taffeta on both sides for added durability. Beautiful sails. I'm really loving them.
pythonguy
Just Enlisted
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:14 pm

Post by pythonguy »

Can anyone advise on using a non-lead filler in the keel? Cement?
User avatar
Richard O'Brien
Captain
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 8:20 am
Location: Lakewood, CO. Mercury 60hp bigfoot M0427B404

Post by Richard O'Brien »

pythonguy wrote:Can anyone advise on using a non-lead filler in the keel? Cement?
I wouldn't recommend it since cement cracks easily, and only weighs 150 -160 lbs. cu. ft. without the larger aggregate. It would bang around too much, and damage the plastic eventually I think. I'm going to try lead shot mixed with epoxy this winter. More weight lower where you need it.
pythonguy
Just Enlisted
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:14 pm

Post by pythonguy »

lead shot with epoxy, that sounds like something even I can do! What kind of epoxy are you using? Do you plan to flow it into the existing hole or cut a larger port into the daggerboard?
User avatar
baldbaby2000
Admiral
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:41 am
Location: Rapid City, SD, 2005 26M, 40hp Tohatsu
Contact:

Post by baldbaby2000 »

I drilled two holes in mine (about 1 1/4" dia. I think). I put one hole forward of the center brace inside the dagger board and then on the opposite side I put another hole aft of the brace about 1 foot up from the bottom of the board (I can measure it if you like). I then taped pieces of aluminum to plug the drain holes at the bottom while I poured in the lead.

Because I was worried about strength--I didn't want the bottom of the board to break off and sink--I put a stainless steel pipe along the aft vertical section of the center brace. I secured it with a screw at the top and bottom and poured some epoxy around it too.

BB
User avatar
Richard O'Brien
Captain
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 8:20 am
Location: Lakewood, CO. Mercury 60hp bigfoot M0427B404

Post by Richard O'Brien »

pythonguy wrote:lead shot with epoxy, that sounds like something even I can do! What kind of epoxy are you using? Do you plan to flow it into the existing hole or cut a larger port into the daggerboard?
I believe I'll follow BB's lead, as he seems to have found the right height?
I always use West System epoxy with "fast" setting catalyst #205. Don't waste time with their pumps, and just measure by volume into plastic pre-marked painter's containers. About 2-3 hrs setting time initially, then 12 hrs. before using.
Don't overuse epoxy as it gets hot, and a little goes a long way.

My current concern is to get the right combination of blocks to hoist the extra weight quickly and completely. Any thoughts Daniel or Leon?
User avatar
delevi
Admiral
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:03 am
Location: San Francisco Catalina 380, former 26M owner
Contact:

Post by delevi »

My current concern is to get the right combination of blocks to hoist the extra weight quickly and completely. Any thoughts Daniel or Leon?
Read my post on page one of this thread about the raising/lowering system

Leon
User avatar
Richard O'Brien
Captain
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 8:20 am
Location: Lakewood, CO. Mercury 60hp bigfoot M0427B404

Post by Richard O'Brien »

Thanks Leon. I wasn't paying enough attention. I think that I only need about 2 to 1 for 50 -70 lbs. Maybe Daniel's setup or even frank's? I already have so much spaghetti in the cockpit that it has become my next situation to address. Do you hear "clunking" when you come about now, or is that not an issue?
User avatar
baldbaby2000
Admiral
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:41 am
Location: Rapid City, SD, 2005 26M, 40hp Tohatsu
Contact:

Post by baldbaby2000 »

With the weight of the board, plus the pipe for strength and the lead my total weight is about 95 lbs. I think this is about 4 times the stock board weight. I have a 5:1 system on my uphaul now. I use mesh bags to hold my lines so the extra length doesn't really bother me too much.

Daniel
Daniel (Sunny Q II)
User avatar
delevi
Admiral
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:03 am
Location: San Francisco Catalina 380, former 26M owner
Contact:

Post by delevi »

Do you hear "clunking" when you come about now, or is that not an issue?
I don't but my board is a bit larger in cord and width than stock, so it takes up almost all the excess space in the db well. The dowside is that it often jams up when fully deploeyd so to pull it back up, I have to either put my whole body into the 6:1 or use the winch for one or two cranks to get it unstuck. There is plenty of reinforcement on the trailing and leading edges in the place where it sits in the well in the fully down postion. I would highly recommend this to anyone with a weighted keel, since even the stock boards get really dammaged along the trailing edge in this area, even w/o extra weight. They just aren't very strong there. The guy who made mine used UHMW, a really strong plastic, shaped the same as the leading and trailing edges of the keel. That area was then cut out of the keel along each edge (17" from the top and about 2 inches deep) and the UHMW was inserted and attached with screws. May be a difficult job with fiberglass, but I would at the very least reinforce th.e trailing edge with some good epoxy.

Leon
User avatar
baldbaby2000
Admiral
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:41 am
Location: Rapid City, SD, 2005 26M, 40hp Tohatsu
Contact:

Post by baldbaby2000 »

Yes, the trailing edge is weak whether you have extra weight or not. The bad thing about breaking the trailing edge after you've added weight is that replacing the board is less of an option because of the added work in adding more weight. I've repaired mine twice. I've thought about glueing some stiff material to the board back there to strengthen it. One also has to consider that the board may not always be down all the way and so quite a bit of the trailing edge may be susceptible to damage if an object is hit.

Daniel
User avatar
delevi
Admiral
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:03 am
Location: San Francisco Catalina 380, former 26M owner
Contact:

Post by delevi »

One also has to consider that the board may not always be down all the way and so quite a bit of the trailing edge may be susceptible to damage if an object is hit.
Yeah. After replacing two of the stock Mac boards due to full breakage on one and a badly damaged trailing edge on the other, I have a new policy with my current one. Either all the way deployed or all the way up. It's the (in-the-middle) stuff which will expose the trailing edge where there is no protection, at lest in my case, and I'm not willing to take that chance with the investment I made. Besides, you want that added ballast working for you as low as possible.

Leon
User avatar
baldbaby2000
Admiral
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:41 am
Location: Rapid City, SD, 2005 26M, 40hp Tohatsu
Contact:

Post by baldbaby2000 »

BB, Can you attach a photo of the pulley system that you used to make raising your centerboard easier?
Mark, here's a photo showing the cheek block (on the right), the raising blocks (center) and the cleat (left). The black thing is the covered boom.

Image

Daniel
Post Reply