maddmike wrote:Boat Insurance? Now that's an interesting new concept!
Maddmike's comment raises a question, as does Catigale's comment - sailing bare when passing his insurer's geo-limit ... I suppose insurance in the USA is (initially) occasioned by either of two "fear factors" and in both cases, we are insuring to replace the asset - the least of the risks.
- 1. if you fork over $30k in cash, you hate to ponder its evaporating in smoke, or roadrash.
2. if you borrow the money, you're forced to insure
My boat's now six years old. Replacing it would be closer to $___ (insert your guess ... maybe $22k?). It's not so shiny anymore, so initial concern over signing a $30k check was probably excessive. Much more important now is the question of liability.
This is where Stephen's comment comes into focus, especially regarding the USA legal system. An inadvertant highway wiggle can "cause" a $120k Mercedes to hit a guardrail ... and the related risk to life & limb is untold? A leaking fuel fitting can induce multi-hundred-thousand dollar fines or clean-up? Years of equity appreciation (either real estate or securities) are risked each time we drive for groceries or motor to a secluded cove.
And just the cost of legal defense can be staggering. The insurance system is as flawed as many others in the USA, including healthcare, education and retirement, each are just the tip of an iceberg. But liability insurance is basically a contribution into a common legal defense fund
I can't be happy about it, but neither can I imagine going without. IMO - check into the cost of just insuring your liability while boating and trailing ... and go BARE on the asset.
