Best outboard motor if you were to repower

A forum for discussing topics relating to MacGregor Powersailor Sailboats

Which is the best motor from this list to put on a used Mac26 these days?

Merc/Yamaha Big Foot 50 4stroke 275#
19
24%
ETEC or TLDI 90 2stroke 335#
41
52%
Suzuki 70 4stroke 360#
8
10%
Mercury 115 4stroke 385#
2
3%
Suzuki 140 4stroke 410#
9
11%
 
Total votes: 79

User avatar
Dimitri-2000X-Tampa
Admiral
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:36 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Tampa, Florida 2000 Mercury BigFoot 50HP 4-Stroke on 26X hull# 3575.B000

Best outboard motor if you were to repower

Post by Dimitri-2000X-Tampa »

All the talk on this board about which motor is best, I wonder what a poll might show. My warranty ran out a long time ago so I just like to think about what I might repower with if I get the impulse.
User avatar
Terry
Admiral
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 2:35 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada. '03 26M - New Yamaha 70

Post by Terry »

Where is the 60HP range to vote on?
I think Mercury & Yamaha both make the 60 hp from the same powerhead as the 50.
User avatar
Dimitri-2000X-Tampa
Admiral
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:36 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Tampa, Florida 2000 Mercury BigFoot 50HP 4-Stroke on 26X hull# 3575.B000

Post by Dimitri-2000X-Tampa »

Sorry guys, I think the polls here only can have 5 answers so I just picked a list I was interested in. I have a 2000 BF 50 which came in a 40 or 50 HP version. After 2001 when the motor changed, I think it came in a 50 or 60 version of the same engine so probably a 60 would make more sense IMO. I didn't really want to compare various 50 hp models, just one 50 will have to do for this one. If I replace my 50 BF, it would likely need to be with a 90 or larger to make it worth the trouble.
User avatar
Catigale
Site Admin
Posts: 10421
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:59 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Admiral .............Catigale 2002X.......Lots of Harpoon Hobie 16 Skiffs....Island 17
Contact:

Post by Catigale »

I think my ideal choice would be a 75 or 90 HP 4 stroke fuel injected motor.

I would up from my present 50 HP not to go faster, but to cruise at 10 kts at lower revs and noise level.

No oil burners for me.....those are for Kixers, kids...
Moe
Admiral
Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 6:35 pm

Post by Moe »

To clarify, the first quote is from James Hebert, the owner of the continuousWave forum... not Moe.

That forum was originally focused on "classic" Whalers, defined by the forum owner as those designed by Dick Fisher or Bob Dougherty, prior to the latter's leaving the company in early 1990. However, like this forum, CW expanded to include the newer models.

As with the 26M, with its reduced ballast aft, the newer Whaler models were designed with the additional weight of a four-stroke on the transom in mind. For the "classic" Whalers any weight advantage of a DFI two-stroke over a four-stroke is significant in terms of handling, not to mention static trim. Nevertheless, as in the Mac community, there are those carrying much heavier outboards than the boat was originally designed for.
User avatar
Scott
Admiral
Posts: 1654
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 12:46 pm
Sailboat: Venture 25
Location: 1978 Catalina 22 with all the Racing Goodies!! 4 horse fire breathing monster on the transom

Post by Scott »

I'd go with an inboard

Image
Mark Prouty
Admiral
Posts: 1723
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:52 am
Location: Madison, WI Former MacGregor 26X Owner

Post by Mark Prouty »

It looks like the E-Tech requires a special oil. I'm just curious. Is this oil pricey and how hard is it to get?

If price were no object, the 90HP E-Tech would get my vote.

Looks like they won't blow up Like the Evenruid Fichts did.
Yesteryear wrote: OMCs two-stroke Ficht outboards have been plagued with problems since they were introduced in 1997 in response to Clean Air Act requirements to reduce hydrocarbon emissions. Ficht fuel injection technology was supposed to reduce emissions by 70% to 80% while increasing fuel efficiency, but early engines became fouled with abrasive soot when operated at low rpm levels. As a result, complete breakdowns occurred while engine hour meters were still registering in the single digits.

Many Ficht owners were sidelined as their engines went through repeated cycles of breakdowns, repairs, factory upgrades and breakdowns. Thousands of engines needed repairs, at a cost of about $1,000 each.
Did the Ficht cause the demise of OMC? That would be my guess.
Last edited by Mark Prouty on Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DLT
Admiral
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Kansas City 2005M 40hp ETEC

Post by DLT »

The ETEC doesn't "require" any special oil. You can use regular two-stroke oil, provided the motor's brain is setup that way.

Alternatively, you CAN have the dealer setup the engine to use their special oil, in which case you only burn about half as much.

There are two places in the Kansas City area that stock the oil. They will also ship it. There are many places out of the Kansas City area that also sell mail order, if need be...

So, the choice is yours...
User avatar
Jeff S
First Officer
Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: Cherry Point, NC 2000 26X Tohatsu 50

Post by Jeff S »

I'd choose a 5-6 year old used carbureted Tohatsu 50hp 2 stroke over all the choices.

Jeff S.
User avatar
Jeff S
First Officer
Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: Cherry Point, NC 2000 26X Tohatsu 50

Post by Jeff S »

Jeff S wrote:I'd choose a 5-6 year old used carbureted Tohatsu 50hp 2 stroke over all the choices.

Jeff S.
Only if money were no object.

I picked the 90hp Tohatsu/Nissan/Etec- the DI 2-strokes seem to be a good all-around choice.

Jeff S
Post Reply