Motor choice
-
motodoc7263
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 6:45 am
- Location: Andrews texas
Motor choice
Regarding motor choice on a 26M. I am buying a boat with an old 2 stroke and I want to change to a new 4 stroke. My main question is, will a 60hp truly easily plane this boat with 2 1/2 people, a weekend of gear, and 24 gallons of fuel on board? I’m not wanting to try to go 25 mph, but would like it to plane easily and cruise at 15-18. Second question is regarding gearing. Which is better for this boat for my purpose, the standard gearing or the lower gearing/ bigger prop like a command thrust? Third question- 20” or 25” shaft?
- dlandersson
- Admiral
- Posts: 4931
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:00 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Michigan City
Re: Motor choice
Not sure what you mean by "easy", but yes it will plane with a 60 HP outboard.
motodoc7263 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 5:49 am Regarding motor choice on a 26M. I am buying a boat with an old 2 stroke and I want to change to a new 4 stroke. My main question is, will a 60hp truly easily plane this boat with 2 1/2 people, a weekend of gear, and 24 gallons of fuel on board? I’m not wanting to try to go 25 mph, but would like it to plane easily and cruise at 15-18. Second question is regarding gearing. Which is better for this boat for my purpose, the standard gearing or the lower gearing/ bigger prop like a command thrust? Third question- 20” or 25” shaft?
- kurz
- Admiral
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Zürich, Switzerland, Europe
Re: Motor choice
I plane with my
fully loaded. Works ok up 5000 rpm an more. So starts at 9kn... Riding with 6000 rpm... you will do not so often...
I use a Merc 60HP, maybe you can get a 70HP Yamaha? At wich rpm the 70HP yamaha will get more power?
I use a Merc 60HP, maybe you can get a 70HP Yamaha? At wich rpm the 70HP yamaha will get more power?
- kmclemore
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6255
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:24 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Ambler, PA -- MACX2018A898 w/ Suzuki DF60AV -- 78 BW Harpoon 4.6 -- 2018 Tahoe 550TF w/ 150 Merc
Re: Motor choice
Actually, I’m in the midst of repowering my 26X presently, and just made the commitment to go with a Suzuki DF60AV, after considerable research and also some discussion with my marina and Todd from BWY. The marina loves Suzuki motors and says they rarely ever need major service. Todd likes the DF60AV and has the performance charts to back up the recommendation. Finally, many of the members here have that motor, and I’ve yet to hear a complaint. So… in a few months I’ll be unloading that old Nissan 50 two stroke in favor of the Suzuki.
- Starscream
- Admiral
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A
Re: Motor choice
After driving an Etec-90 for 10 years, and now a Suzuki DF-90A, my opinion on "planing" a 26X has changed.
I used to think that the Etec-90 was planing the boat at 22mph, but after experiencing the DF90A, I can say that there is a very big difference between running at 22mph and running at 25+ mph. The Etec couldn't get the boat over 22 to 23 mph (more like 19 or 20mph with a full ballast), and with the Suzuki 90 I discovered that right around the 25 mph mark the nose of the boat suddenly comes down a few degrees and the speed will increase quickly up to 28 or 29 mph, kind of like it's breaking through some sort of barrier. With light loading I maxed out at 30mph with the Suzi. After experiencing this, I don't believe that the X was truly planing at 22 mph, and I don't think that a 60HP could really do any better than the Etec90. A 60HP will get the 26 up and over its bow-wave and well beyond hull speed, so it IS skimming/planing on the water in a certain way, but more like a plow and less like a skipping stone.
I'm not sure that the X is truly planing at 29mph either, but it certainly feels different than what it does at 22 mph. Both motors were the same HP, but the Etec turned a 14x11 prop with a 2:1 gear ratio at 4500 motor RPM, and the Suzi turns a 13.875x15 prop with a 2.6:1 ratio at 6000 RPM. The X is certainly better suited to a larger prop turning at lower RPM (the prop rpm, not the motor rpm). The larger prop also gives a much better performance for docking. The Suzuki 15" prop makes it almost like the boat has brakes.
A lot of owners have had good experience with large-prop 60 HP motors, many getting numbers similar to my small-prop Etec90. (Large/small is relative to the motor HP).
My advice is that everything else being equal, the motor that can turn the largest prop is the best plan for the X. It's the best for docking, and it's the best for low RPM on long-term cruising at hull speed. Experience shows that the same motor HP gets a lot better top speed with the larger prop, too.
I used to think that the Etec-90 was planing the boat at 22mph, but after experiencing the DF90A, I can say that there is a very big difference between running at 22mph and running at 25+ mph. The Etec couldn't get the boat over 22 to 23 mph (more like 19 or 20mph with a full ballast), and with the Suzuki 90 I discovered that right around the 25 mph mark the nose of the boat suddenly comes down a few degrees and the speed will increase quickly up to 28 or 29 mph, kind of like it's breaking through some sort of barrier. With light loading I maxed out at 30mph with the Suzi. After experiencing this, I don't believe that the X was truly planing at 22 mph, and I don't think that a 60HP could really do any better than the Etec90. A 60HP will get the 26 up and over its bow-wave and well beyond hull speed, so it IS skimming/planing on the water in a certain way, but more like a plow and less like a skipping stone.
I'm not sure that the X is truly planing at 29mph either, but it certainly feels different than what it does at 22 mph. Both motors were the same HP, but the Etec turned a 14x11 prop with a 2:1 gear ratio at 4500 motor RPM, and the Suzi turns a 13.875x15 prop with a 2.6:1 ratio at 6000 RPM. The X is certainly better suited to a larger prop turning at lower RPM (the prop rpm, not the motor rpm). The larger prop also gives a much better performance for docking. The Suzuki 15" prop makes it almost like the boat has brakes.
A lot of owners have had good experience with large-prop 60 HP motors, many getting numbers similar to my small-prop Etec90. (Large/small is relative to the motor HP).
My advice is that everything else being equal, the motor that can turn the largest prop is the best plan for the X. It's the best for docking, and it's the best for low RPM on long-term cruising at hull speed. Experience shows that the same motor HP gets a lot better top speed with the larger prop, too.
- Starscream
- Admiral
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A
Re: Motor choice
Interesting, I didn't know that Suzuki made an AV version with a higher gear ratio. The 60HP AV version is 2.42:1 while the standard 60 HPversion is 2.27:1. Evinrude also made a pontoon version of their 90HP, which had a gear ratio of 2.36:1 instead of 2.0:1 like the standard Etec90. After I originally bought the Etec90, I often thought that I should have specced the pontoon series.kmclemore wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 2:51 pm Actually, I’m in the midst of repowering my 26X presently, and just made the commitment to go with a Suzuki DF60AV, after considerable research and also some discussion with my marina and Todd from BWY. The marina loves Suzuki motors and says they rarely ever need major service. Todd likes the DF60AV and has the performance charts to back up the recommendation. Finally, many of the members here have that motor, and I’ve yet to hear a complaint. So… in a few months I’ll be unloading that old Nissan 50 two stroke in favor of the Suzuki.
The prop of the AV version will turn slower at the same motor RPM, which allows a larger prop. That makes a lot of sense based on my experience, and stories of other large-prop motors like the Mercury Bigfoot. I know that OE also put on a Suzi 60HP, and is very satisfied with it, but I don't know if it's the AV version or not.... OE?
Last edited by Starscream on Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- kmclemore
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6255
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:24 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Ambler, PA -- MACX2018A898 w/ Suzuki DF60AV -- 78 BW Harpoon 4.6 -- 2018 Tahoe 550TF w/ 150 Merc
Re: Motor choice
Yep, and hopefully it will be a good one.Starscream wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 8:50 amInteresting, I didn't know that Suzuki made an AV version with a higher gear ratio.
https://www.suzukimarine.com/outboard/40-90hp/df60av/
- pitchpolehobie
- Captain
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:46 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: USA, OH
Re: Motor choice
Waiting to hear about speed with the 60AV and a normal cruising load on the boat. 
2002 MacGregor 26X: Remedium
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
- kmclemore
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6255
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:24 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Ambler, PA -- MACX2018A898 w/ Suzuki DF60AV -- 78 BW Harpoon 4.6 -- 2018 Tahoe 550TF w/ 150 Merc
Re: Motor choice
I corresponded with Todd at Blue Water Yachts about this. He sent me charts that document the tests, but the end result is that his "favorite is the Suzuki DF60AV with the high thrust (big prop) lower unit" (he thinks it was a 14" dia. x 11" pitch). He "found the 60AV to be almost as fast as the older Suzuki 70, although at somewhat higher RPM, but much smaller and lighter".pitchpolehobie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 8:17 am Waiting to hear about speed with the 60AV and a normal cruising load on the boat.![]()
His tests were on a normally configured Mac with the usual supplies, but not heavy-laden for cruising.
-
Drifter
- First Officer
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:56 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Borneo
Re: Motor choice
I'm very seriously looking into fitting a new Yamaha 85 2-stroke (can still get new 2 smokes in Borneo).
That should be considerably lighter than a 60 4-stroke, I'd presume? Heck, let's go ask a brain... actually no:
The weight of a Suzuki DF60 4-stroke outboard is 229 lbs
. In comparison, the Yamaha 85 2-stroke outboard weighs around 257 lbs
So about 30lb heavier, but an extra 15 ponies. The same brain tells me a 90 hp 4-stroke would be 350-400lb, so certainly a lot lighter for it's power. Also less weight hanging on the transom.
Any thoughts regarding such a beast on an X?
That should be considerably lighter than a 60 4-stroke, I'd presume? Heck, let's go ask a brain... actually no:
The weight of a Suzuki DF60 4-stroke outboard is 229 lbs
. In comparison, the Yamaha 85 2-stroke outboard weighs around 257 lbs
So about 30lb heavier, but an extra 15 ponies. The same brain tells me a 90 hp 4-stroke would be 350-400lb, so certainly a lot lighter for it's power. Also less weight hanging on the transom.
Any thoughts regarding such a beast on an X?
- Russ
- Admiral
- Posts: 8299
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi
Re: Motor choice
Will be interesting to see your results. That motor also seems substantially lighter than the heavier 70.kmclemore wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:03 amI corresponded with Todd at Blue Water Yachts about this. He sent me charts that document the tests, but the end result is that his "favorite is the Suzuki DF60AV with the high thrust (big prop) lower unit" (he thinks it was a 14" dia. x 11" pitch). He "found the 60AV to be almost as fast as the older Suzuki 70, although at somewhat higher RPM, but much smaller and lighter".pitchpolehobie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 8:17 am Waiting to hear about speed with the 60AV and a normal cruising load on the boat.![]()
His tests were on a normally configured Mac with the usual supplies, but not heavy-laden for cruising.
The prop Todd put on my DF70 was too big for my altitude. I'm sure it's perfect for sea level, but I couldn't get to max WOT RPMs. I think I now have a 14x11 which works well.
--Russ
- Russ
- Admiral
- Posts: 8299
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi
Re: Motor choice
Why just "bigger"? Why not "more".?
Drifter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:49 am
Yesterday I was just thinking "I wonder how Drifter is doing, haven't heard from him in a while?"
Why are you considering repowering? Is that motor still giving you grief?
Folks have mounted bigger motors on these boats. My Suzuki DF70 comes in at about 340lbs which I believe the DF90 clocks in about the same.
Some captains have installed even larger (> 110hp) motors.
The way I use the boat, I rarely operate above 8mph and don't need the extra horses. I'm sure the motor doesn't like how slow I use it. I will open it up every once in a while to blow out the carbon. It is nice to know that I have the extra reserve if I need to get out of someplace quick.
--Russ
- pitchpolehobie
- Captain
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:46 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: USA, OH
Re: Motor choice
Ive thought on and off about repowering from my 25hp 4stroke....If you dont mind...Whats the cost for engine parts and labor for the 60AV. How do you plan to get rid of the old engine? Craigslist etc?
2002 MacGregor 26X: Remedium
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
- kmclemore
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6255
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:24 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Ambler, PA -- MACX2018A898 w/ Suzuki DF60AV -- 78 BW Harpoon 4.6 -- 2018 Tahoe 550TF w/ 150 Merc
Re: Motor choice
I plan on selling it on Craigslist & Facebook. I took lots of photos and videos of it running at different speeds while we had the boat out this summer, so that I could then offer evidence that it's a decent motor.pitchpolehobie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:55 pm Ive thought on and off about repowering from my 25hp 4stroke....If you dont mind...Whats the cost for engine parts and labor for the 60AV. How do you plan to get rid of the old engine? Craigslist etc?
I'm getting the Suzuki DF60AV (black) for $6,659 and the labor to install it is $2,500. I checked around and that's about the cheapest I could find in our area.
-
Drifter
- First Officer
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:56 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Borneo
Re: Motor choice
I thought I already replied here but looks like it didn't go through? Try again...

My old Honda 50 is fine, as far as I know, worked well last time, but it's pretty ancient now, and some parts are no longer available. I'd also like more power, to come closer to the claimed "25 mph" of the advertWhy are you considering repowering? Is that motor still giving you grief?
