Since I put on a new 50hp Merc last Jan. I am sticking with the Mac.X.
If I got pulled over , they would put me in the slammer. My almost new front disk stainless steel brakes are still on my old axel, my max. 2000lb tow on my f150 extended cab standard trans. will not do it in the eyes of the enforcer (been doing it for 5 years). Clutch thing over auto trans.
Dave
Tomfoolery wrote:Perhaps a minor point, but just so you know, 8'-6" is legal in all States on the Interstate Highway System, and for some distance from the interstate (since access has to be allowed somehow). RVers talk about this a lot of their forums, as many are now built at 102" width. It's a problem, for sure, when state DOT or police decide to pull out the tape measure if you're in a 96" State and not on the Interstate. I don't know what the answer is, but it would be nice if States would adopt the 102" width uniformly. There are some parts of the Interstate system that ban 102" vehicles, too, but those are mostly in highly congested urban areas, like some bridges and tunnels into/out of NYC.bartmac wrote:....and having checked an US site on vehicle width...some US states are 8ft some 8ft6 and some 9ft....so I imagine any manufacturer would not build to a size which excludes sales to a significant number of states!
But at least you can pass through more restrictive States without worrying about getting fined.
Oh, and if I could get my hands on a lightweight water ballasted sailboat like my, but with another couple of feet of length and 6" of beam, I'd probably stop there. An outboard would be better than an inboard, as the space needed by the inboard would eat up any advantage of another 2 ft of length. Swing keel and kickup rudder(s) for skinny water, and minimal teak (I've had boats with lots of teak - no more).
Where can I order one of those?![]()
![]()
Glad to see Laura popping in now and again, too. Puts a face on the company.
