Page 2 of 5

Upgrade

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:45 am
by Terry
I voted because if there was a viable competitor at the time of my purchase I could easily have been swayed. I multiplied $35K CDN X 1.17 to get $40K US which is what I started out with, I have since spent well over $5K in additional accessories. After a few seasons sailing, experience has given me the hindsight to say that if I could go back in time with my hindsight I would choose a viable competitor.
I noticed at the Vancouver Boat Show a couple weeks ago that the most appealing aspect of the larger boats that got my attention was the beam, it translated into a more roomier boat, I like that, the Mac is just too skinny. I see the 28 is only 6 wider but it is still road legal and an incremental 6 over the additional 2 would likely help prevent the Admiral and I from getting under each others feet. As long as I can tow it with a class III tow vehicle and class III hitch (up to 5000 lbs) I would give it serious consideration, in fact I may even be willing to sell my M and if I can do it with out much further expense, buy a 28.
As far as power goes I usually cruise at 3-4000 rpm, about 10 knots, rarely WOT. I also have to ask really, just how fast does the Mac go under power when loaded with a weeks worth of gear, ballast and the whole family. How fast can you travel in rough seas? We have discovered that we lean towards being sailors more than power boaters and really have no need to be planning even though some say the Mac does not plane. If the competition leaned toward sailing performance/creature comforts over power performance I would consider it, but it would be nice if under power it could achieve the 10 knots I like to cruise at, maybe a bigger engine would help.
I see mention of having power to outrun a storm, makes me wonder how often this situation presents itself and how negligent sailors must be for this to happen on any kind of regular basis. Kind of reminds me of having four wheel drive, nice to have when you need it but how often does that happen. Yes, I have a four wheel Trailblazer, had a four wheel Blazer for ten years before that and I can count on one hand how many times I had to use it. I live in the great white north but rarely see the white stuff. Convertible cars also come to mind, you have to be brain dead to have one here, it rains all the time.
I can understand the need for speed where children and power boaters at heart are concerned but I am a sailor at heart and I have no intention of going out in risky weather if I can help it. Yes, I realize that during extended cruising anything can happen, and I will prepare and act accordingly. I will also admit that when we first got our Mac I was guilty of practicing the WOT stuff just for the thrill, but the novelty has since worn off and it no longer appeals to me as much. (Still do it though)
I noticed mention of family use, we have no children so it is not a consideration. I also have to wonder about the target market, age bracket, size, financial status etc. There are many baby boomers entering the empty nest stage of their lives and looking at a lifestyle change, they are also inheriting their parents wealth, something to consider. These pocket cruisers are very appealing to childless couples and empty nesters, not everyone has children. The Mac is a very fine boat and considering the target market and how many owners/potential owners there are I believe there is room for competition as long as it is worthy competition, the kind that can steal MacGregor customers.
AWKIII:
It would be prudent on your part to do further research on potential target markets and then perhaps tweak your design to appeal to them. Think about how many Mac owners there are and their satisfaction with their purchase. You need the right product in the right place, at the right time, in the right quantity and at the right price and then you will be successful. I will be watching for your final product to see if it meets my needs. Good Luck!
:D
On Edit
35 X 1.17 = 40.95 move the decimal over three places to account for three zeros and you get $40,950. At todays exchange rate we can buy American currency for 1.17 cdn for 1.00 US Did I get it right? Someone has questioned my math, now I am not sure.
Second edit
OK now I see it, 35K US would cost me 41K CDN as Homer would say DOOHHH I voted $40KUS wich would be about 47K CDN which is about how far into it I am in CDN $ including tax.

beachable!

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:08 pm
by Richard O'Brien
My Marina has a small beach and there are always 1 or 2 Macs there. I could get by with less horsepower maybe but as mentioned above: 1.
Easily launched by one old guy. 2. beachable. If you could devise a swing keel shaped like a fan that swung down and plugged it's own trunk, I could even give up the daggerboard. Many mac owners (but not all :wink: ) are first time owners. They like to be able to improve on their boats gradually. Many manufacturers seem to want to dazzle you with electronics, carbon sails, and others stuff i'd rather add over time.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:50 pm
by AWKIII
Richard....

FYI.

The boat would be as easy to launch and retrieve as the Mac. It would also be beachable.

Small world. See you are from Colorado. From what I understand, this boat would be built just north of Longmont!

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:22 pm
by They Theirs
AWKIII
Anything like this Russian Trailer Sailboat?

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:44 pm
by baldbaby2000
I too worry about pulling that much weight: 4400 lbs + trailer weight + all the other stuff we carry. Sounds like a nice boat but I don't think I'd want to trailer it much. My 26M with motor, and trailer is about 3500 lbs. Still I'd consider it and maybe not trailer as much as I do now. You say it's as easy to launch and retrieve as the Mac; will it be as easy and quick to rig?

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:44 pm
by AWKIII
Hi Guys:

Thanks for the continued input.

As far as rigging the boat is concerned. At first there was discussion about using carbon fiber spars to reduce weight. But the cost is just too prohibitive. However, raising and lowering will be just as simple as it is with the Mac. The boat will come standard with a newly designed system that is somewhat similar. I have raised the mast on a M with and without the mast raising system. Trying to do it on any boat without one can be a dangerous proposition at best.

As far as the Russian boat. I saw these pics on the sight a few weeks ago. I would really like to see the specs on this boat as it seems real tender. The degree of heel on this boat in relation to what appears to be very light wind is a little disconcerting to me. I wish the guys would allow me to post some of the drawings. I think they would speak for themselves when trying to compare one boat against another. I will ask again.

I was wondering if there is anyone with fiberglass boat construction experience on this site? People have many theories why the Mac is priced at $20,000.00 for a base boat and the Hunter and Catalina 25's are roughly twice that price.

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:34 am
by aya16
I agree with most of the rest here. The boat you are talking about would be looked at by me but the M would be the one I bought. Its the ability to
motor faster that would make the Mac the first choice for me.

A mac 28 with an 8.5 beam with a 150hp motor able to go 20 knots would be my first choice. Dont get me wrong but I will sail a lot farther out then most day sailors because I know if I want to get in at a certain time the Mac will come in two to three times faster than any other sail boat.

another brand of boat would almost have to be a knock off of the Mac with more beam and two feet longer, from there I would go to a non trailer wide beam boat.

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:42 am
by James V
AWKIII - REALLY!! not worth my time.

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:57 am
by AWKIII
James:

You are right. My apologies.

That question is another subject topic altogether and one I will leave alone.

Just want you to know. I own a M. Before that, A MacGregor 25 and before that a MacGregor 17.

I am 48 years old and have owned MacGregor products my entire adult life.

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:32 am
by Richard O'Brien
AWKIII wrote:Hi Guys:
I was wondering if there is anyone with fiberglass boat construction experience on this site? People have many theories why the Mac is priced at $20,000.00 for a base boat and the Hunter and Catalina 25's are roughly twice that price.
I don't have the requisite experience, just some moldmaking. I wonder if it's because of the quantities (tank cars) of resin Roger orders, combined with the saving by not using chop-guns. You really do get much higher strength with less material choosing mat,and woven glass, yet higher labor costs?

RE: Longmont, Colorado?? The sailing capital of the.......? Hmm! There isn't any water here. It's short grass prarie, almost a desert? Why here? Oh well "Wind" is my favorite sailing movie. :?

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:33 am
by Tom Root
AWKIII wrote:James:

You are right. My apologies.

That question is another subject topic altogether and one I will leave alone.

Just want you to know. I own a M. Before that, A MacGregor 25 and before that a MacGregor 17.

I am 48 years old and have owned MacGregor products my entire adult life.
You sir are not alone in that sentiment, and fact!

I once was asked by a bystander who asked "What kind of sailboat is that?" I replied that it was in fact a MacGregor....is there any other brand made?!!! :D

I am on my 3rd Mac, and have my eye only one more eventually, and funds willing.....A 65' or 70', if at all possible!

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:03 pm
by AWKIII
Richard:

Ditto on "Wind" as my favorite sailing movie. I grew up in Newport, R.I. so it has real special meaning to me.

There is plenty of water in Colorado! You just have to find it! :D Besides, isn't that what a trailerable is for? :D

I am south of you. Right in the middle of Denver and Colorado Springs. Have sailed Pueblo, Cherry Creek (Ugh!), Chatfield, Dillon and Carter.

Don't want to stir a hornets nest regarding the other issue. But you are getting warm. Look at the fiberglass to resin ratio and there is your answer. Only production boat know of built this way......backwards. :wink:

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:27 pm
by LOUIS B HOLUB
I like the simplicity of the Mac design...1 hull, 1 hull liner, 1 deck, 1 deck liner, attach the hardware....and WAAA LAAA. I like the "strength" in this process because when all bolted, and molded together...this boat is strong. When competitors begin adding a little teak, a couple extra lights, and the charge is $$thousands more....I'll stick to a Mac.
Making and adding "upgrades" saves thousands....and by the way...its "fun".... Im sure there are Mac owners that would agree, right ??
:macx:
Holub Boat

who can resist a can of worms?

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:10 pm
by Richard O'Brien
Oops! I meant "Hornet's nest". In any case, We all know the Macs are paper thin above the water line, and that worries me a little, but like Louis observed they seem to be simply designed for their task, and the hull is firmly bonded to the deck. I sometimes hear of vessels separating along this line, or racing craft collapsing along portholes, and near the mast. Usually the result of a rogue wave, which Mac's should never encounter. I have seen the results of a couple of Mac's being struck, and was impressed by the minimal damage. :idea: I'd still add a layer of carbon /kevlar to the mix.

AWKIII,
If you near Parker or Castle Pines, it looks like you're going to get the largest new dam of all in 2010, with the Reuter-Hess reservoir. I hope they open it for sailing :)

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:28 pm
by Catigale
I didnt vote but my guess is you could get 40k for this design at the top end.

For me, the trailerability/launchability of the Mac makes it unique - I have 17k plus 8k upgrades into my 77 Ericson 32 foot so once I make the keel boat commitment my price point falls due to the used boat market.