Page 2 of 2

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:17 am
by Stevenhigbee
So you think I made a mistake wiring him the money? :D



You did good if you sent him a cashiers check on a foreign bank for $10000 over the asking price, and asked him to wire the extra money to your friend who is going to pick it up and deliver it to you.

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:25 am
by BOAT
The Peterson is a far superior boat than the Hunter - go for the Peterson boat - the Hunter is junk.

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 1:53 pm
by yukonbob
BOAT wrote:The Peterson is a far superior boat than the Hunter - go for the Peterson boat - the Hunter is junk.
Aside from most people saying this about Hunters (and Catalina's and Macs :P ) they do have a really nice layout with all the amenities (read: lack of bulkheads). I was looking at a Peterson as well but can't get over the cabin being totally geared towards a crew and not cruisers.

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 2:41 pm
by BOAT
I have not been hearing people say bad things about the Catalina, that's a new one to me. Hunter, on the other hand, is considered the scrapings of the waterfront over here - In Oceanside they say that the Hunter is the tub where you dump your dirty bilge water. They sink more than any other boat. (They are horribly under-built for their size).

Image

Image

Image

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 2:59 pm
by yukonbob
Having to re-caulk the keel joint every year or completely re-structure the keel joint on Cat's is the main concern I'm referring too. I've heard the same thing about Hunters and pretty much every other production boat out there. Looking at your photos really begs the question of how much is quality and how much is user error :wink:

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 3:12 pm
by BOAT
yukonbob wrote:Having to re-caulk the keel joint every year or completely re-structure the keel joint on Cat's is the main concern I'm referring too. I've heard the same thing about Hunters and pretty much every other production boat out there. Looking at your photos really begs the question of how much is quality and how much is user error :wink:
ALL the boats above sunk because of structure failure - The first boat caught it's keel on the bottom at high tide, and then the tide went out and the boat lay on it's side. When the tide came back in the waves made the boat go up and down on the sand bar and pounded a hole in the side.

The second boat sunk off Catalina when it's bow cleat tore right off on a mooring.

The third boat also went aground because it's mooring cleats tore right out of the boat taking chunks of the boat with it. Hunter uses high grade hardware on low grade structure - that's why I keep telling you guys to not upgrade your cleats - the cleats on the MAC were mated with the structure of the boat so the cleats fail before the boat fails. The opposite is catastrophic.

Just lousy engineering all around. My brother had one - he said the same thing. People are impressed with the hardware on the Hunter and they think that because there is good hardware it must be a good boat. If your going to use cleats and winches that can take thousands of pounds you need to make a deck that can handle it too.


Yacht Survey Online:

“Sail boats utilize grid/liners more frequently. Fortunately, a sailboat hull is considerable more amenable to this design, both by its shape and the fact that they are not subjected to the forces of high speed. Even so, one of the largest boats built with a full grid/liner was a Hunter 60 that experienced total liner disbonding and failure. Yet even their smaller models were widely known for liner failures.”

You get posts like this all over the blogs:

"One-piece grids are being used to virtually eliminate the traditional framing system, replacing it with a liner system that is literally glued into the hull. Glued, you say? Well, they call it bonding putty but an adhesive by any other name is still a glue.
Those of you experienced with Hunter sail boats will know what I mean. They were one of the first to use full interior grids, albeit not necessarily a liner, and much of their product line suffered massive bonding failures, including their large 60 footer.one of the largest boats built with a full grid/liner was a Hunter 60 that experienced total liner disbonding and failure. Yet even their smaller models were widely known for liner failures....."
That quote was from: Marine Surveys : Surveying Boats with Molded Integral Grid Systems

The below is from Marine Surveying : Hull Design Defects - Hull Failure Part II - Boats and Yachts Surveys:
First impressions are often lasting ones, especially when they are negative impressions like my first experience with Hunter in the early 1980's. Back then I had been hired by an unfortunate Hunter owner who had a forty footer with a grid liner that all came apart, causing some serious structural problems. At the time, Hunter had just converted to the use of grid liners (one of, if not the first to do so) and were far from perfecting the method, once again proving my point that far too many boat builders perform their experimentation in their product line, at the expense of their customers.

BOATUS, whom most of us are members including me had a pretty bad review of the structure of the Hunter by Jack Horner:

http://www.boatus.com/boatreviews/sail/ ... gend35.asp

And don’t even get me started on the rudder failures! You can go online and find all the incidence of rudder failure that you want.

My first knowledge of Hunter rudder failures happened about 10 years ago when I saw a Legend being towed into the Oceanside Harbor. A guy in a ski boat found the Hunter and its skipper offshore drifting towards the breakers. The owner said the rudder failed.

I don't know, maybe they really are good boats, I don't know I guess because I do not own one - but based on what the boat survey people say I would stear clear of them.

Yet another survey of the Hunter 28 By David Pascoe:

Image

A winged, bulbous keel? Ought to be fun trying to get unstuck when you run aground in this one. Especially in mud. The bottom of the thing is shaped like a giant suction cup. A winged keel made of cast lead? Wow, what a great idea! Oh, well, maybe you'll have fun hammering it back in shape every time you run aground. Does that oddly shaped hunk of lead reduce resistance and makes it go faster, too? Not likely. But it certainly had the effect of making her unusually tender. You notice that the moment you step aboard.

http://www.yachtsurvey.com/boatreviews/hunter28.htm

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:46 pm
by yukonbob
I guess after hearing the same kind of fear mongering about mac's I'm taking your review of Hunters with great sceptasim having proclaimed never to have owned one and most likely never set foot on one. I just find it hard to believe that if a company mass produced the inevitable death trap as you've described, how it's possible that they remain one of the largest boat manufacturers in the world, maybe it's a numbers game; with that many out there there's bound to be more incidents. I in no way plan to purchase one now or in the future but Hunter keeps making boats and people keep buying them

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 6:06 pm
by Jimmyt
Something about this sounds vaguely familiar... Oh yeah, reminds me of reading similar reviews of those death trap water ballasted macgregors - which inspired me to buy one. I was amazed when I actually survived the test sail. Did I go through some sort of dimensional shift and pop up in sailing anarchy?

Why can't we all just get along? Kum ba yah anyone?

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:30 pm
by BOAT
Actually Hunter is not all that big - in fact they were bought by Marlow, and now I don't know who owns them. As for numbers it's not that great - 700 total boats of their most popular model, and production runs of less than 300 on each other model. Don't get me wrong, that is probably one of the most numerous as far as production boats go.

I am not bad mouthing the Hunter with rumors and innuendo like the MAC bashers do - the MAC bashers say the MAC is dangerous but the proof is in the facts - how many MACS have sunk compared to how many Hunters have sunk - it's pretty clear if you just go by the numbers.

No one has ever said the MAC had any structural deficiencies, yet you can find dozens of reputable marine surveys on the structural deficiencies of the Hunter boats.

It's just plain facts.

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:42 pm
by Jimmyt
Just pulling your leg Boat.

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:56 pm
by Russ
Jimmyt wrote:Something about this sounds vaguely familiar... Oh yeah, reminds me of reading similar reviews of those death trap water ballasted macgregors - which inspired me to buy one. I was amazed when I actually survived the test sail. Did I go through some sort of dimensional shift and pop up in sailing anarchy?

Why can't we all just get along? Kum ba yah anyone?
+1

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:40 am
by Ixneigh
My answer for addressing structural deck deficiencies is fiberglass and lots of it. It is user error if you park your boat on a sandbar. But yea it's not crelock.
Ix

Re: Anyone looking for a Mac 65, $28,500

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:07 am
by BOAT
Yeah, sandbars can be a problem - that's the thing about a Hunter boat - make a mistake and your in more trouble than you thought. That aside - this pernicious problem that Hunters have for losing mooring cleats that rip right off the boat because the deck gives way is something I can't blame the skippers on. In particular the bow cleat on the larger Hunter boats - when the bow cleats rip off a big chunk of the bow goes right with it leaving a big hole in the front of the boat.

More fiberglass might be one way to deal with structure, but I can tell you from building surfboards that more resin does not make a thing stronger - only heavier. It's the laminations that create strength - but one thing added resin can do is add flexibility. Of course, with added flexibility comes cracks.

Both schools do exist though. Many boat builders make their hulls thick and heavy and flexible while others make them light and stiff and very hard. The downside of the flexible hull is that it cracks and the downfall of the hard hull is that it 's brittle.

The Hunter is neither - it's a different design like a waffle - they have a grid structure glued into the hull to provide the strength and it works really good until the glue gives way. That was their attempt to make a lighter boat.