wind and wave limits for mac 26X
-
JotaErre
- Engineer
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:23 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Spain
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
I have sailed with a 17 knots wind, two-people crew and full sails up (mainsail and genoa)... the Mac behaved beautifully.
When I sail single-handed, I usually unfurl the genoa but don't raise the main sail... two thongs is the maximum I can control simultaneously: helm and genoa.
This way I have sailed with 25 knots. Of course, the boat heeled, but I didn't find it dangerous... in fact, it was a lot of fun.
When I sail single-handed, I usually unfurl the genoa but don't raise the main sail... two thongs is the maximum I can control simultaneously: helm and genoa.
This way I have sailed with 25 knots. Of course, the boat heeled, but I didn't find it dangerous... in fact, it was a lot of fun.
- kurz
- Admiral
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Zürich, Switzerland, Europe
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
Just with Genoa: How do you realize a tack???JotaErre wrote: When I sail single-handed, I usually unfurl the genoa but don't raise the main sail...
- Catigale
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:59 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Admiral .............Catigale 2002X.......Lots of Harpoon Hobie 16 Skiffs....Island 17
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
The 150 Genny will tack but you have to get through the eye of the wind fairly quickly compared to keel boats. It doesn't point well, so you have to fall off on the new tack and build trim and speed back up.
Or have my born-on the water NZ friends tack it, but his skill set exceeds mine by a rather large amount I would rather not specify....
Or have my born-on the water NZ friends tack it, but his skill set exceeds mine by a rather large amount I would rather not specify....
- sailboatmike
- Admiral
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 10:17 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Australia
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
Rule No 1 I have learnt, you need speed to tack, if you put too much rudder input to get across the wind fast she will stall out real fast, Its a delicate balance, so be prepared to back wind the foresail if your not carrying enough speed or put to much rudder input
-
paul I
- First Officer
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:43 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Niagara Falls, NY 2000 26X w/Honda BF50 "NoneShallPass"
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
I've done this dozens of times. Sometimes we go out for just an hour or two after work. The main is too much hassle for such a short sailing period, especially when its already dark when the time comes to lower it and get a cover on it. As long as there is 5 knots of wind or better, the genoa alone will power the boat just fine. Tacking is not a problem, Mike is right about the rudder issue though. It has stalled and backfilled on me when I've steered too far, and in light winds, it will do that even if the main is raised.kurz wrote:Just with Genoa: How do you realize a tack???JotaErre wrote: When I sail single-handed, I usually unfurl the genoa but don't raise the main sail...
- mastreb
- Admiral
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:00 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Cardiff by the Sea, CA ETEC-60 "Luna Sea"
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
In terms of theoretical wave limits, a boat can be capsized by an abeam breaking wave that is 1/3 the length of the boat overall, which is usually about the width of the beam. On a Mac, that's 7'8", very close to it's 7'10" beam. With a drogue keeping the boat bow or stern to the waves, the theoretical limit is the LOA.
Breaking waves however are not the same thing as heavy rolling waves. Rolling waves are quite a bit safer. I've been out in 6' rolling waves, and while it's scary, it doesn't seem unsafe. It's rather difficult to sail in those conditions however, because waves that size rotate the boat with more force than the helm can counter.
With one reef point, reef at 15 knots and go home at 20. With a 2nd deep reef, you can reef at 20 and go home at 25. Use the roller furling jib to balance the helm differently after each reef. If you expect winds over 15 knots, go out with your first reef in and your 2nd reef ready.
Breaking waves however are not the same thing as heavy rolling waves. Rolling waves are quite a bit safer. I've been out in 6' rolling waves, and while it's scary, it doesn't seem unsafe. It's rather difficult to sail in those conditions however, because waves that size rotate the boat with more force than the helm can counter.
With one reef point, reef at 15 knots and go home at 20. With a 2nd deep reef, you can reef at 20 and go home at 25. Use the roller furling jib to balance the helm differently after each reef. If you expect winds over 15 knots, go out with your first reef in and your 2nd reef ready.
- Herschel
- Admiral
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:22 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
I just have one set of reef points on my mainsail, which is original equipment on my '98 26X. Could you tell me how far up the luff you have your second reef points? Thanks.With a 2nd deep reef
- Wind Chime
- Captain
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 4:30 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada. 2000-26X, Suzuki-50hp, 8' Walker-Bay tender (with sailkit)
- Contact:
- Herschel
- Admiral
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:22 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
Looks like the second set of reef points are about the same distance from the first set as the first set is from the boom. Does that sound right?
- Wind Chime
- Captain
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 4:30 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada. 2000-26X, Suzuki-50hp, 8' Walker-Bay tender (with sailkit)
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
Ya, that sounds about right although I've never actually measured the distance. I think the bottom picture might give the best view when you look at luff reef cringle and reinforcing triangles.
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
The reef point on the original sail is a second reef according to most standards, they skipped the first.With a 2nd deep reef
I just have one set of reef points on my mainsail, which is original equipment on my '98 26X. Could you tell me how far up the luff you have your second reef points? Thanks.

Judy B has posted Reef 1 default 12% of luff
Reef 2 default 26% of luff
Reef 3 default 41% of luff
Which would put the 1st up about 3', 2nd (original single on mac) at 6.5', and third at 10.25'.
My deepest reef is up by the spreaders. Its the reef I have used the most this year, we either had a little wind or a lot. It makes sailing in stronger winds more pleasant.

Video clip of comfortable sailing with 3rd reef.
http://s1121.photobucket.com/user/lazyp ... k.mp4.html
- Herschel
- Admiral
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:22 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
That fits. I know I put one batten into the reefed sail when I reef.The reef point on the original sail is a second reef according to most standards, they skipped the first
-
JotaErre
- Engineer
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:23 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Spain
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
I try to do it when I have enough speed... I wait to change the genoa to the new lee side, because if you keep in in the "old" lee side for a while, it pushes the bow and helps the boat to complete the tack.kurz wrote:Just with Genoa: How do you realize a tack???JotaErre wrote: When I sail single-handed, I usually unfurl the genoa but don't raise the main sail...
- Judy B
- First Officer
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:37 pm
- Sailboat: Other
- Location: San Francisco Bay area and any where my hybrid SUV can tow my boat
- Contact:
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
Yes, that reef in the video looks to be about 40% of the luff, comparing it to the spreader location and upper shroud attachments.Seapup wrote:The reef point on the original sail is a second reef according to most standards, they skipped the first.With a 2nd deep reef
I just have one set of reef points on my mainsail, which is original equipment on my '98 26X. Could you tell me how far up the luff you have your second reef points? Thanks.
Judy B has posted Reef 1 default 12% of luff
Reef 2 default 26% of luff
Reef 3 default 41% of luff
Which would put the 1st up about 3', 2nd (original single on mac) at 6.5', and third at 10.25'.
My deepest reef is up by the spreaders. Its the reef I have used the most this year, we either had a little wind or a lot. It makes sailing in stronger winds more pleasant.
Video clip of comfortable sailing with 3rd reef.
http://s1121.photobucket.com/user/lazyp ... k.mp4.html
For the "2nd" reef, the factory specified it to be at 7' up the luff out of 27.42 feet. Our sails put it at 7.1 feet up the luff; no significant difference in that sense. However, our sails have a bit more roach to them than the factory ones did.
BTW, that sail looks nicely trimmed in the picture you posted
BTW #2. The position of the deepest reef has to take the height of the forestay into account. We always want the top of the headboard to be above the forestay attachment point. If the headboard on the mainsail is below the forestay, it could cause the mast to invert (flex backward between the spreaders and the mast butt). That would destabilize the rig. So while there are "defaults", the reef points have to be chosen after considering the actual geometry of the rig and the "stiffness" of the boat compared to its sailplan.
Judy B
- Bilgemaster
- First Officer
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 5:03 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Woodbridge, Virginia--"Breakin' Wind" 2001 26X, Honda BF50A 50hp engine
Re: wind and wave limits for mac 26X
When I was younger I might have been able to handle two thongs, but back then they weren't really popular, except maybe in the seedier parts of Amsterdam. What with me geezing out and all, I wonder if I could even handle one without getting all tangled up. Now, on the other hand, a good practical pair of Depends gives a fella a little bit of purchase and a good hand hold!JotaErre wrote:... two thongs is the maximum I can control simultaneously


