Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

A forum for discussing topics relating to MacGregor Powersailor Sailboats
User avatar
dlandersson
Admiral
Posts: 4937
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:00 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Michigan City

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by dlandersson »

[That's pretty much it - beam is 7 ft, 10 inches :wink:

quote=pitchpolehobie post_id=351555 time=1624032290 user_id=19142]
My incomplete understand was that the length of the 26 x/m series was limited by the beam of 8 feet to ensure trailer ability on US roads without additional permits and expense. Maybe someone w more knowledge could weigh in. Otherwise yes it'd be great to have a 28ft version w a standing galley.
[/quote]
User avatar
Bilgemaster
First Officer
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 5:03 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Woodbridge, Virginia--"Breakin' Wind" 2001 26X, Honda BF50A 50hp engine

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Bilgemaster »

pitchpolehobie wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:23 am https://m.alibaba.com/product/158556632 ... x140xz.jpg

I can't figure out if its the X or the M based on the stolen pics. I wonder if they've even built any. Were the plans hacked? Maybe tattoo yachts soldout.
Ahhh...the Über-Fantastic Hison! (As in, "You'd have to be high son to buy one"). Proud marque of one of arguably the most stunningly subpar and least inspiring boat sales videos of all time titled, "World's Most Fantastic Sailboat of This Year," featuring a couple of shnooks from the Hison factory distractedly wallowing around in what must be one of their earlier Mac-ripoff prototypes given a triple-whacking with the ugly stick. From the old tires used as fenders to the bored hunchback dude wearing the shredded remains of some odd half-T-shirt looking like he just finished crapping over the side, it all just hollers, "Class!" Yessirree boys--that's some sleek sampan! Presumably the "Smoke on the Water" soundtrack must be a marketing homage to those planning to burn them to the waterline for the insurance money:
User avatar
Tomfoolery
Admiral
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:42 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Rochester, NY '99X BF50 'Tomfoolery'

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Tomfoolery »

The old tires hanging off the rub rail are a nice touch. Paging Captain Ron! :D
Tom
Be seeing you . . .
User avatar
Jimmyt
Admiral
Posts: 3402
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:52 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Mobile AL 2013 26M, 60 Etec

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Jimmyt »

Wish I had known that was acceptable... I could have used that fender money for something more fun. :D
Jimmyt
P-Cub-Boo
2013 26M, Etec 60, roller Genoa, roller main
Cruising Waters: Mobile Bay, Western Shore, Fowl River
User avatar
pitchpolehobie
Captain
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:46 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: USA, OH

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by pitchpolehobie »

So Rog sold them the mold.
2002 MacGregor 26X: Remedium
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
OverEasy
Admiral
Posts: 2885
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:16 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: NH & SC

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by OverEasy »

Hi Bilgemaster,

I take it you didn’t like it, eh? :D :D

Thought Rodger gave/sold the company to his daughter or something like that to bring the Tattoo into production in Florida?

Funny it shows up in a low budget Hison video somewhere in China?

If they have the actual molds and didn’t make reverse casting molds it’s disappointing. :( :(

Wonder what the back story is…….🤔
OverEasy
Admiral
Posts: 2885
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:16 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: NH & SC

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by OverEasy »

Hi Pitchpole and Dlandersson

The 102 inch width RVs are a bane to city streets.
Several wallow through town here on a regular basis to get jammed at the intersections and parking lots on their way south only to return a few months later north bound. Wouldn’t have thought a couple of inches could be much trouble….. 🤔 …. But what do I know.

I may have gotten this wrong but from several of the boat design books read when we were originally contemplating building vs. buying that there is a standard ratio formula for beam to length as related to nominal stability but there have been several designers that have made statements to the effect that a more minimal beam does not necessarily make a sailing vessel unstable if compensated by things like hull shape, ballast, skegs and keel/rudder.

Now we chose to buy a Mac26X because it was inherently better than anything we could reasonably design/build. It has a proven track record of safety, performance and comfort that is really hard to argue with. At the same time it is trailerable and adaptable.

The extra foot or so would be beneficial for those looking for a step up if it could incorporate several of the common mods made to the Xs and Ms. Just wonder if the increase in headroom and length would really necessitate an increase in beam…..

8) 8) 🐩
User avatar
dlandersson
Admiral
Posts: 4937
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:00 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Michigan City

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by dlandersson »

"we chose to buy a Mac26X because it was inherently better than anything we could reasonably design/build" :)
OverEasy wrote: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:07 pm Hi Pitchpole and Dlandersson

The 102 inch width RVs are a bane to city streets.
Several wallow through town here on a regular basis to get jammed at the intersections and parking lots on their way south only to return a few months later north bound. Wouldn’t have thought a couple of inches could be much trouble….. 🤔 …. But what do I know.

I may have gotten this wrong but from several of the boat design books read when we were originally contemplating building vs. buying that there is a standard ratio formula for beam to length as related to nominal stability but there have been several designers that have made statements to the effect that a more minimal beam does not necessarily make a sailing vessel unstable if compensated by things like hull shape, ballast, skegs and keel/rudder.

Now we chose to buy a Mac26X because it was inherently better than anything we could reasonably design/build. It has a proven track record of safety, performance and comfort that is really hard to argue with. At the same time it is trailerable and adaptable.

The extra foot or so would be beneficial for those looking for a step up if it could incorporate several of the common mods made to the Xs and Ms. Just wonder if the increase in headroom and length would really necessitate an increase in beam…..

8) 8) 🐩
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1892
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Be Free »

One definition of "fantastic" is "strange and imaginary, or not reasonable". I think under that definition is is certainly the most fantastic sailboat of the year. :wink:
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
pitchpolehobie
Captain
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:46 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: USA, OH

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by pitchpolehobie »

Got a black Friday email w updated pictures and the 1st boat...Wow!
Image

Image

https://venturasportboats.com/ventura-2300/

This is an exciting development for the community!
2002 MacGregor 26X: Remedium
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
User avatar
NiceAft
Admiral
Posts: 6706
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:28 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Upper Dublin,PA, USA: 2005M 50hp.Honda4strk.,1979 Phantom Sport Sailboat, 9'Achilles 6HP Merc 4strk

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by NiceAft »

Is it April’s Fool’s and I don’t know it, and six years late?
Ray ~~_/)~~
User avatar
Russ
Admiral
Posts: 8305
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Russ »

Interesting. So is that the Tattoo 22 hull mold? Kind of looks like it.

The last post on the Tattoo 22 was TEN YEARS AGO!

https://tattooyachts.com/tattoo-22-photos/
--Russ
OverEasy
Admiral
Posts: 2885
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:16 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: NH & SC

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by OverEasy »

A little closer look at the “brochure…. Please note the delivery date…….

Image
User avatar
Russ
Admiral
Posts: 8305
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by Russ »

OverEasy wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 4:03 pm A little closer look at the “brochure…. Please note the delivery date…….

Image
The plot thickens.
--Russ
User avatar
NiceAft
Admiral
Posts: 6706
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:28 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Upper Dublin,PA, USA: 2005M 50hp.Honda4strk.,1979 Phantom Sport Sailboat, 9'Achilles 6HP Merc 4strk

Re: Ventura 2300 actually gonna be built?

Post by NiceAft »

Seems like I pointed that out earlier.

NiceAft wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:20 pm Is it April’s Fool’s and I don’t know it, and six years late?
Ray ~~_/)~~
Post Reply